Re: ASCII-folded search [was: Re: Upcoming loss of usability ...]

[Artur Malabarba]

> However, as has been discussed in several threads in the past,
> here and in the bug list, there are several char-folding
> possibilities that we might want to offer.
>
> There are any number of reasonable, default character equivalence
> classes that you can think of.  And users themselves can come up
> with any number of other such equivalence classes, some of which
> are specific to a particular context.

True, and which equivalence classes to offer is a whole new topic all
by itself. But the implementation is there now, all it takes it to
offer more tables for it.