[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow)
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow) |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Mar 2010 22:19:09 -0500 |
RS> If it only supports something like Emacs Lisp then it is not much of
RS> an advance. Guile supports Scheme and Javascript as well as Emacs Lisp.
It also supports multithreading, which IMHO is a big deal as well,
perhaps more important than bignums.
I think the support for multiple languages is the biggest advance.
I hope support for other popular extension languages will be implemented
eventually -- that was the original goal of Guile.
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Chad Brown, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow),
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Johan Bockgård, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/06
Re: Next pretest, and branching plans, Christoph, 2010/03/13