[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow)
From: |
Chad Brown |
Subject: |
Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow) |
Date: |
Mon, 8 Mar 2010 10:42:39 -0800 |
Ken Raeburn has done some work on Guile in Emacs, which might be helpful.
There's a (not super-current) status page here:
http://www.mit.edu/~raeburn/guilemacs/
Summary: there is something runable, but it's certainly not finished. There
are some design questions that I think it's safe to say are still in an
`exploratory' phase. Ken has given some thought to threading (not a surprise
if you know Ken), but as of the middle of last year (the date on the status
update), I would characterize his progress as `thoughts and questions'.
Hope this helps,
*Chad
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Davis Herring, 2010/03/06
- RE: integer overflow, Drew Adams, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Jay Belanger, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow),
Chad Brown <=
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Johan Bockgård, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/06