[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: integer overflow
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
Re: integer overflow |
Date: |
Sun, 07 Mar 2010 22:49:08 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) |
David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:
...
> bignum support alone indeed should be reasonably straightforward. It
> should certainly speed up Emacs calc once Emacs calc is cleaned up to
> use it.
Yes, and if Emacs gets bignum support it shouldn't take long for Calc to
use it. (Oddly enough, while he might have written Calc anyhow, being
able to work with big integers was one of Dave Gillespie's motivations
to write Calc.)
Jay
- Re: integer overflow, (continued)
- Re: integer overflow, Glenn Morris, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow, Chong Yidong, 2010/03/05
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Stefan Monnier, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Davis Herring, 2010/03/06
- RE: integer overflow, Drew Adams, 2010/03/06
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow, David Kastrup, 2010/03/07
- Re: integer overflow,
Jay Belanger <=
- Re: integer overflow, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Chad Brown, 2010/03/08
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2010/03/09
- Re: Guile in Emacs, Ken Raeburn, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs, David Kastrup, 2010/03/10
- Re: Guile in Emacs (was: integer overflow), Richard Stallman, 2010/03/08
- Re: integer overflow, Helmut Eller, 2010/03/06