[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
Date: |
Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:08:23 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> There are *many* ways for the user to shoot herself in the foot and make
> her Emacs session completely unusable.
> We won't try all, but it is useful to catch some. unintern is not
> used a lot, so don't worry about the cpu time.
As maintainer I care about maintainability of the code. I will reject
such a change.
Stefan
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, (continued)
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Chong Yidong, 2009/11/20
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Sam Steingold, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/22
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Ken Raeburn, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Tom Tromey, 2009/11/18