Re: t and nil in pure memory?

[Stefan Monnier]

>     I am skeptical that we have everything in place that is required to
>     properly support

>     (unintern nil)
>     (unintern t)

> We should make them give errors -- that's much easier than
> making them "work".  There's no reason they should be allowed.

Rather I think there's no reason to spend any time either making them
work or making them signal an error.


        Stefan