[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: t and nil in pure memory?
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: t and nil in pure memory? |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Nov 2009 20:26:47 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> If one sorts the pure symbols to the end of the obarray bucket chain
> before dumping, they can't possibly be followed by non-pure symbols in
> their life time since intern adds to the front of a bucket chain.
Except when you call unintern, of course.
No, I'm just not willing to go there. Too much trouble, too little gain.
Stefan
- t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/11
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/11
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 2009/11/12
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/12
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Dan Nicolaescu, 2009/11/13
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/13
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/14
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/15
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/16
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, David Kastrup, 2009/11/17
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Daniel Colascione, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/18
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Richard Stallman, 2009/11/19
- Re: t and nil in pure memory?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/11/19