[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PURESIZE increased (again)
From: |
Luc Teirlinck |
Subject: |
Re: PURESIZE increased (again) |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Apr 2006 21:06:06 -0500 (CDT) |
>From my previous message:
Comparing my present pure-bytes-used of 1200904 with the 1036280 from
an old CVS version of 2005-02-07, suggests that pure-bytes-used is
currently growing faster than 13 percent a year (between the the
reference points I used it grew at an annualized rate of 13.7
percent).
And that was with a feature freeze in effect during the entire period.
Sincerely,
Luc.
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), (continued)
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), David Kastrup, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Robert J. Chassell, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Dan Nicolaescu, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/24
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again),
Luc Teirlinck <=
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Luc Teirlinck, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/22
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Richard Stallman, 2006/04/23
- Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Romain Francoise, 2006/04/16
Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Eli Zaretskii, 2006/04/16
Re: PURESIZE increased (again), Bill Wohler, 2006/04/18