[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Tue, 04 Dec 2001 06:29:42 -0500 |
> WRAPPER-FORM looks like (WRAPPER-HOOK FUNC ARG...), where FUNC is the
> original function that is currently being wrapped and ARG... is the
> list of arguments passed to each wrapper in WRAPPER-HOOK. Each
> wrapper receives FUNC followed by ARG... All wrappers must call the
> original function from within itself. While this macro is calling
I suggest to make this FUNC into just a convention (after all, the
code for with-wrapper-hook does not actually use it, depend on it
or anything like that).
Also, the function does not have to call the original function.
It can use its own code if it wants to.
So I'd just say something like:
WRAPPER-FORM looks like (WRAPPER-HOOK ARGS...), where ARGS is a
list of arguments passed to each function in WRAPPER-HOOK.
While this macro is calling....
-- Stefan
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03