[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: table.el
From: |
Tak Ota |
Subject: |
Re: table.el |
Date: |
Mon, 03 Dec 2001 21:37:03 -0800 (PST) |
Mon, 3 Dec 2001 17:59:02 -0700 (MST): Richard Stallman <address@hidden> wrote:
> BTW, as I wrote above I found a minor flaw in my approach. When the
> original function has some operation in interactive body, that
> operation can not be wrapped.
>
> Why not? I don't see why this would not work. But we could be
> failing to communicate. Could you show us the full scenario, and
> explain the problem?
Sorry my confusion. When the function is called interactively the
interactive form must be processed even before the wrapper's
pre-processing. The current wrapper works this way so there is no
problem.
-Tak
- Re: table.el, (continued)
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/02
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el,
Tak Ota <=
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Miles Bader, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Richard Stallman, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/03
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Tak Ota, 2001/12/04
- Re: table.el, Stefan Monnier, 2001/12/05