[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations
From: |
Robert J. Chassell |
Subject: |
Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Dec 2000 07:25:55 -0500 (EST) |
> Have you *ever* read an HTML style guide that said that
> the <blink> tag is good? Most of them say that the <blink> tags are
> evil because they keep the user from being able to concentrate on
> the real content. The blinking block cursor is no different.
Well, yes it is different, because it's *very small*, and easily lost
among dense text.
Small?!! I am now running just ran the CVS snapshot for the version
from Sunday, 2000 Dec 17 11:48 GMT, started this way:
$ /usr/local/bin/emacs -q --no-site-file
My cursor is anything but small. It is a big block cursor that
*never* gets lost in text, whether blinking or not. I bet you are
starting Emacs with a very narrow vertical bar type of cursor, or a
period or dot. Where do you set that variable? The type of cursor is
not set in an Emacs .emacs file or site file, since I have turned
those off.
I agree with Bill, the blinking block is an abomination.
Normally, I start test versions of Emacs with the command line argument:
-eval '(blink-cursor-mode 0)'
--
Robert J. Chassell address@hidden
Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com
- Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/19
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Dave Love, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Dave Love, 2000/12/20