[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations |
Date: |
20 Dec 2000 18:18:55 +0900 |
Bill Wohler <address@hidden> writes:
> Yup, it is a matter of opinion; I can't believe there wasn't a
> consensus.
None-the-less, there wasn't. There were voices on both sides.
> Have you *ever* read an HTML style guide that said that
> the <blink> tag is good? Most of them say that the <blink> tags are
> evil because they keep the user from being able to concentrate on
> the real content. The blinking block cursor is no different.
Well, yes it is different, because it's *very small*, and easily lost
among dense text.
> > I wonder, are you perhaps using the monochrome icons? Those are much
> > worse than the colors ones (since they were produced automatically).
>
> I'm using whatever came out of the box. They are monochrome. How do
> I turn on the color ones?
I'm not sure; the color icons are distributed in `xpm' format, so if
your system is missing the xpm library, then I guess emacs won't be able
to read them.
When you run the configure script, there should be a line near the end
like this:
Does Emacs use -lXpm? yes
If it says `no' instead of `yes', then presumably you don't have libXpm.
-Miles
--
Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over,
pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come. --Nietzsche
- Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/19
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Bill Wohler, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/20
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Dave Love, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Miles Bader, 2000/12/21
- Re: Very initial Emacs 21 observations, Dave Love, 2000/12/20