[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[debbugs-tracker] bug#25233: closed (parted is confused by ISO images, m
From: |
GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: |
[debbugs-tracker] bug#25233: closed (parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates sizes/offsets) |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:23:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:23:59 -0400
with message-id <address@hidden>
and subject line Re: bug#25233: parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates
sizes/offsets
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25233,
regarding parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates sizes/offsets
to be marked as done.
(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
address@hidden)
--
25233: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25233
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates sizes/offsets |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2016 13:19:15 +0100 |
Hi all,
[My name is Bjørn Forsman, end user of parted, I'm using parted as my
primary partitioning tool.]
When I run parted (latest version, 3.2) on an ISO file, it gets
confused about the block size:
$ parted ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso p
WARNING: You are not superuser. Watch out for permissions.
Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.
Ignore/Cancel?
If I select "Ignore", it misinterprets the size and the partition table:
Model: (file)
Disk /home/bfo/Downloads/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 5944MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/512B
Partition Table: mac
Disk Flags:
Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
1 2048B 6143B 4096B Apple
2 1479MB 1481MB 2425kB EFI
And if I select "Cancel" it gets the size right but doesn't show any more data:
Model: (file)
Disk /home/bfo/Downloads/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 1486MB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
Partition Table: unknown
Disk Flags:
Why cannot parted handle this like fdisk?
$ fdisk -l ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso
Disk ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 1.4 GiB, 1485881344 bytes,
2902112 sectors
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
Disklabel type: dos
Disk identifier: 0x0e0e8e70
Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type
ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso1 * 0 2902111 2902112 1.4G 0 Empty
ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso2 2888004 2892739 4736 2.3M
ef EFI (FAT-12/16/32)
I wonder if commit f98f791e19669b900345dad7d96ea4df974e4596
("libparted: device mapper uses 512b sectors") fixes this.
This commit is from february 2015. Any plans on making a new release?
(I'm an end user, I use released software.)
Best regards,
Bjørn Forsman
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Subject: |
Re: bug#25233: parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates sizes/offsets |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:23:59 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 |
On 12/19/2016 7:19 AM, Bjørn Forsman wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> [My name is Bjørn Forsman, end user of parted, I'm using parted as my
> primary partitioning tool.]
>
> When I run parted (latest version, 3.2) on an ISO file, it gets
> confused about the block size:
>
> $ parted ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso p
> WARNING: You are not superuser. Watch out for permissions.
> Warning: The driver descriptor says the physical block size is 2048
> bytes, but Linux says it is 512 bytes.
> Ignore/Cancel?
This is because the image contains a mac partition table using a block
size of 2048 bytes since the image is meant to go on a cdrom, which has
a sector size of 2048 bytes.
> If I select "Ignore", it misinterprets the size and the partition table:
>
> Model: (file)
> Disk /home/bfo/Downloads/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 5944MB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 2048B/512B
> Partition Table: mac
> Disk Flags:
>
> Number Start End Size File system Name Flags
> 1 2048B 6143B 4096B Apple
> 2 1479MB 1481MB 2425kB EFI
No; that is correctly interpreting the partition table.
> And if I select "Cancel" it gets the size right but doesn't show any more
> data:
>
> Model: (file)
> Disk /home/bfo/Downloads/ubuntu-16.04-desktop-amd64.iso: 1486MB
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B
> Partition Table: unknown
> Disk Flags:
This has the size wrong, and shows no data since you bailed out of
trying to interpret the mac partition table.
> Why cannot parted handle this like fdisk?
Because fdisk does not know about mac partition tables.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [debbugs-tracker] bug#25233: closed (parted is confused by ISO images, miscalculates sizes/offsets),
GNU bug Tracking System <=