|
From: | GNU bug Tracking System |
Subject: | [debbugs-tracker] bug#25198: closed (bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed) |
Date: | Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:16:02 +0000 |
Your message dated Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:17:05 -0400 with message-id <address@hidden> and subject line Re: bug#25198: bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #25198, regarding bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed to be marked as done. (If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact address@hidden) -- 25198: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=25198 GNU Bug Tracking System Contact address@hidden with problems
--- Begin Message ---Subject: bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 01:09:57 +0200 Hi,Runningparted -lcrashes withBacktrace has 15 calls on stack:15: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_assert+0x44) [0x7f58e0393644]14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x20b26) [0x7f58e03a6b26]13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x120aa) [0x7f58e03980aa]12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_add_partition+0x263) [0x7f58e03989a3]11: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x20405) [0x7f58e03a6405]10: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x204a0) [0x7f58e03a64a0]9: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x204a0) [0x7f58e03a64a0]8: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x2043f) [0x7f58e03a643f]7: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(+0x21555) [0x7f58e03a7555]6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libparted.so.2(ped_disk_new+0x48) [0x7f58e03985c8]5: parted() [0x407769]4: parted() [0x4069cf]3: parted(main+0x11b2) [0x405f82]2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xf5) [0x7f58dfb88b45]1: parted() [0x405fc7]You found a bug in GNU Parted! Here's what you have to do:Don't panic! The bug has most likely not affected any of your data.Help us to fix this bug by doing the following:Check whether the bug has already been fixed by checkingthe last version of GNU Parted that you can find at:Please check this version prior to bug reporting.If this has not been fixed yet or if you don't know how to check,please visit the GNU Parted website:for further information.Your report should contain the version of this release (3.2)along with the error message below, the output ofparted DEVICE unit co print unit s printand the following history of commands you entered.Also include any additional information about your setup youconsider important.Assertion (metadata_length > 0) at ../../../libparted/labels/dos.c:2313 infunction add_logical_part_metadata() failed.As much as I found searching aroud mentioned about partitions needing at least a sector in between eachother for metadata - is that it? Weird thing is that everything worked before I removed my Windows partition from the gap in between sda1 and sda3.Output of fdisk -l:Disk /dev/sda: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectorsUnits: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytesSector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytesI/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytesDisklabel type: dosDisk identifier: 0x9a232254Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type/dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT/dev/sda3 397805566 485435391 87629826 41.8G 5 Extended/dev/sda5 397805568 436865023 39059456 18.6G 83 Linux/dev/sda6 436867072 466163711 29296640 14G 83 Linux/dev/sda7 466163712 485435391 19271680 9.2G 82 Linux swap / SolarisBR,Rauno
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Subject: Re: bug#25198: bug: assertion (metadata_length > 0) failed Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:17:05 -0400 User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 On 12/13/2016 6:09 PM, Rauno Viskus wrote: > As much as I found searching aroud mentioned about partitions needing at > least a sector in between eachother for metadata - is that it? Weird thing > is that everything worked before I removed my Windows partition from the > gap in between sda1 and sda3. > > Output of fdisk -l: > > > Disk /dev/sda: 238.5 GiB, 256060514304 bytes, 500118192 sectors > Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes > Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes > Disklabel type: dos > Disk identifier: 0x9a232254 > > Device Boot Start End Sectors Size Id Type > /dev/sda1 * 2048 3074047 3072000 1.5G 7 HPFS/NTFS/exFAT > /dev/sda3 397805566 485435391 87629826 41.8G 5 Extended > /dev/sda5 397805568 436865023 39059456 18.6G 83 Linux > /dev/sda6 436867072 466163711 29296640 14G 83 Linux > /dev/sda7 466163712 485435391 19271680 9.2G 82 Linux swap / Solaris Yes, you have to have at least one sector between partitions for the chained EBR. I'm curious as to what messed up partitioning tool created this layout.
--- End Message ---
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |