[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?
From: |
Martin Coxall |
Subject: |
RE: [DotGNU]What .NET is this? |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Nov 2001 11:10:49 -0000 |
> However, we do need a strong platform underneath
> that makes writing such alternatives interfaces easier.
> Right now, a new native binary is needed for every
> new alternative. That doesn't scale well.
> Rhys.
Is the W3C's XForms proposal (which I believe is designed to overcome the
shortcomings of HTML forms as you detailed) the answer we are looking for? I
haven't examined it in any great detail.
http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/Forms/
Assuming it's not released under a RAND license, of course.
Martin
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Jens Müller, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Jens Müller, 2001/11/03
- [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- RE: [DotGNU]Multi-paradigm programming, Martin Coxall, 2001/11/05
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/03
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Bill Lance, 2001/11/04
- RE: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?,
Martin Coxall <=
- Re: [DotGNU]What .NET is this?, Rhys Weatherley, 2001/11/05