Re: Plans for ahead

[Maxthon Chan]

If you don’t feel like implementing them now I would suggest at least put them 
on the long term goal list. There will be a time when SWK or CEF start to meet 
their shortcomings.

> On Dec 7, 2015, at 12:11, Gregory Casamento <greg.casamento@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Chan,
> 
> On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:53 PM, ChanMaxthon <xcvista@me.com> wrote:
>> No matter how we wrap around a Linux browser it stays a major out-of-tree
>> patch set but if we implement the dependencies ourselves it would be only
>> minimal patching if any.
> 
> While it does remain out of tree, it is foolish to think that
> implementing all of the things needed to either get SWK working to the
> point where it can take over from WebKit or that we can port WebKit
> itself in any reasonable amount of time.
> 
> The only way to have a practical usable browser NOW is to do what I
> have proposed.
> 
> GC
> -- 
> Gregory Casamento
> GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
> http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
> http://ind.ie/phoenix/

smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature