[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Plans for ahead
From: |
Gregory Casamento |
Subject: |
Re: Plans for ahead |
Date: |
Sun, 6 Dec 2015 23:11:02 -0500 |
Chan,
On Sun, Dec 6, 2015 at 10:53 PM, ChanMaxthon <xcvista@me.com> wrote:
> No matter how we wrap around a Linux browser it stays a major out-of-tree
> patch set but if we implement the dependencies ourselves it would be only
> minimal patching if any.
While it does remain out of tree, it is foolish to think that
implementing all of the things needed to either get SWK working to the
point where it can take over from WebKit or that we can port WebKit
itself in any reasonable amount of time.
The only way to have a practical usable browser NOW is to do what I
have proposed.
GC
--
Gregory Casamento
GNUstep Lead Developer / OLC, Principal Consultant
http://www.gnustep.org - http://heronsperch.blogspot.com
http://ind.ie/phoenix/
- Re: Plans for ahead, (continued)
- Re: Plans for ahead, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/05
- Re: Plans for ahead, Luis Garcia Alanis, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, James Carthew, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Svetlana A. Tkachenko, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, ChanMaxthon, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, James Carthew, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Luis Garcia Alanis, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, ChanMaxthon, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead,
Gregory Casamento <=
- Re: Plans for ahead, Maxthon Chan, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, James Carthew, 2015/12/07
- Re: Plans for ahead, Gregory Casamento, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Nicolas Roard, 2015/12/06
- Re: Plans for ahead, Riccardo Mottola, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, H. Nikolaus Schaller, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Ivan Vučica, 2015/12/04
- Re: Plans for ahead, Michael P. Soulier, 2015/12/03