[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace)
From: |
Vaisburd, Haim |
Subject: |
RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace) |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Aug 2007 13:52:05 -0700 |
Richard Frith-MacDonald wrote:
> If that Richard is meant to be me ...
Yes. No offense meant!
Now I do not know whether to apologise for not writing your family name
or to stress that simple "Richard" means you thremendous contribution
and influence.
> I'll just go on record publicly here as saying that the above is
untrue.
> My position is the same as that of Greg and other developers ... in
favour of OSX compatibility,
> but that does not stop any of us being disgusted by some of the
MacOS-X bloat, and does not in the
> slightest imply that 'OSX rules'.
I was sloppy formulating this, as Markus Hitter says, it's rather "Cocoa
rules".
> It's perfectly possible to aim for compatibility (for portability
purposes)
> while deprecating the use of poorly designed APIs.
I would need some time to answer this and Gregory's post.
Gregory, thank you for prompt response.
Thank you,
Tima
- The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/03
- Re: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/08/03
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace),
Vaisburd, Haim <=
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/06
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/07
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/08
- Re: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/08/11