[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace)
From: |
Vaisburd, Haim |
Subject: |
RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace) |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Aug 2007 12:32:22 -0700 |
Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf <lars.sonchocky-helldorf@hamburg.de> wrote:
> Am 07.08.2007 um 03:22 schrieb Vaisburd, Haim:
>> For this, of course, we should not abandon X windows like Apple
>> did.
> FYI: Neither NeXT nor Apple did ever use X as their windowing system.
> You'd better get informed before you starting to rant.
Wikipedia's "X Window System" article annotates the following link as
being from
Mike Paquette, Apple Computer:
http://developers.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=75257&cid=6734612
<Quote>
"Why Apple didn't use X for the window system"
[...]
Things we'd need to add/extend in X Window software
(protocol+server+manager+fonts+...):
[... - 9 points I omit - ...]
So, yes, it looks like we can use X for Quartz. All we need do is
[... -more omissions- ...]
Just what did we gain from this?
Oh, yeah. My mom can run an xterm session on her desktop now without
downloading the Apple X11 package, a shareware X server or buying a
software package.
Been there, evaluated that.
</Quote>
So, as far as the source can be trusted, Apple abandoned the _idea_ of
using X Windows
after evaluating it.
FYI: I do not rant. Ever.
Always yours,
Tima
- The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/03
- Re: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/08/03
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/03
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/06
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace),
Vaisburd, Haim <=
- RE: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Vaisburd, Haim, 2007/08/08
- Re: The future of GNUstep (was: Open URL in NSWorkspace), Gregory John Casamento, 2007/08/11