Re: Also bothered

[Chris Vine]

Read it again and you will see the posting was a spoof, artificially
mashed up by a random expression generator from a radio/electronics
related expression list.  Either ignore him or blacklist him from the
mailing list.

-----------------------------------------------
On Mon, 6 Feb 2023 16:00:45 +0100
Marcus Müller <mmueller@gnuradio.org> wrote:
> Dear Matt,
> 
> this is just a quick reminder that this is the GNU Radio mailing list – 
> we're pretty open about the topics we discuss here, but your last three 
> emails were a bit far off.
> 
> Since (I think) you're new in this community: In case you wonder what 
> GNU Radio is exactly, there's a really nice introduction,
> https://wiki.gnuradio.org/index.php?title=What_Is_GNU_Radio
> 
> Best regards,
> Marcus
> 
> On 2/6/23 09:28, Matt Young wrote:
> > In ham radio we have twenty manufacturer all writing and producing 
> > their own LCD screens and menus. A nightmare.s Thy all started with 
> > DSP function then suddenly loads of investments into screens.
> >
> > Just add a USB port to the machines and plug in a chromebook, which 
> > costs 155.  Three hundred dollars save at the shack, money spent on 
> > pre and post analog for dealing with this chaotic atmosphere.
> >
> > The DSP is simple, we need in and out DACs at 8 mHz, 16 bit. We need 
> > ar least 80 Mflops of fixed point 32 bit signal 'taps'. Add in a 
> > separate center frequency LO on output.  Opens the market big time.  
> > Floating point does no good, if you did you Z transforms, 
> > everything should be scaled.
> > Your source code really is set of pure linear discrete inductance, 
> > capacitance and transconductance.  There are no parasitics.  We can 
> > generate assembly from Spice, then each DSP makerwrits thor own linker 
> > from Spice to DSP..
> >
> > Code never changes across bands.  The local oscillator mixes in the 
> > high precision interface to the antenna.  We really want the isolation 
> > of the digital from the horrors of atmospheric RF static.