[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores
From: |
Chris Gray |
Subject: |
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Oct 2004 19:02:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
On Thursday 07 October 2004 09:43, Jeroen Frijters wrote:
> Casey Marshall wrote:
> > Robert> After spending some time on ideas to fix this the following
> > Robert> came to my mind:
> > Robert> a) do the NaN,Infinity in Java and the rest in C
> > Robert> b) do both in C because its faster
> > Robert> c) provide a pure Java and a pure C version, making
> > Robert> JNode/... and real VMs equally happy
> >
> > I am a fan of (c), and in general I like it better if there is a pure
> > Java version first. I also don't tend to blindly believe that a C
> > version will be universally faster.
> > [...]
> Hear! Hear!
>
> (Sorry not to add anything meaningful, but I just had to voice my
> support.)
ME3
--
Chris Gray /k/ Embedded Java Solutions
Embedded & Mobile Java, OSGi http://www.kiffer.be/k/
address@hidden +32 3 216 0369
- RE: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores,
Chris Gray <=
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Archie Cobbs, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Archie Cobbs, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Chris Pickett, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/08