[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores
From: |
Sven de Marothy |
Subject: |
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:26:14 +0200 |
Andrew Haley writes:
>> Has anyone seen that one:
>> http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailitem&item_id=10491
>> I recently discovered it while writing some test files for the
>> XMLDecoder I am working on. In an attempt to find the reason I
followed
>> to the C source that does the conversion (java_lang_Double.c) and its
>> obvious to me that the code does not care about the special values:
>> [+-]NaN, [+-]Infinity
>What is really wrong here? The bug has no test case, and doesn't
>really explain.
I think he's talking about Double.parseDouble(), an input string of
"NaN" should return a NaN double. Now, it throws an exception.
One-liner:
System.out.println(Double.parseDouble("NaN"));
Although, personally.. I'm not so sure of re-writing it in Java. Seems
like overkill for a relatively trivial bug.
(Of course, you could have both too, and add a build-time option. )
/Sven
- RE: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Jeroen Frijters, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores,
Sven de Marothy <=
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Sven de Marothy, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Archie Cobbs, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Per Bothner, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Archie Cobbs, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Chris Pickett, 2004/10/07
- Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Andrew Haley, 2004/10/08
Re: bug 10491 was Re: More astonishing progress in japi scores, Robert Schuster, 2004/10/07