classpath-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [cp-patches] Patch PING: java.util.{Currency, Date} and collection c


From: Andrew John Hughes
Subject: Re: [cp-patches] Patch PING: java.util.{Currency, Date} and collection classes updates
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 09:26:02 +0100

On Wed, 2004-10-20 at 07:39, Michael Koch wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 20. Oktober 2004 00:49 schrieb Andrew John Hughes:
> > Hi all,
> >  I still have a few patches waiting to be committed from a fair
> > while back.  These are:
> >
> > * Revision 01: Documentation for java.util Collections
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-09/msg0000
> >4.html
> 
> +     * @return "[]".
> 
> Should perhaps be '@return the string "[]"'
> 
> true and false should be written as "<code>true</code>" to make it 
> look a little different in final documentation.
> 
> Otherwise very good. Please commit.

Thanks.  Committed.
> 
> >* Documentation and serialization patch for java.util.Currency
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-09/msg0000
> >3.html 
> 
> +    for (int i=0;i<allLocales.length;i++)
> 
> Please add whitespace before and after "=" and "<" and before "i++". 
> This makes it much more readable.
> 
> Otherwise very good. Please commit.
> 

Must have missed that one -- I agree it looks ugly and I'm not the
culprit.  Committed.

> >* Documentation Patch 02 (java.util.Date) 
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-09/msg0002
> >4.html
> 
> Okay, but please add a @specnote about when this was changed.
> 

Can you be a bit more specific here?  Are we talking about a specific
change or something general to the class?  Its a while since I wrote
this one, and all I can see is doc. updates.

> > There is also:
> >
> > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath-patches/2004-09/msg0005
> >9.html
> >
> > which really needs a Mauve test case before committal.
> 
> The documentation parts are okay. Please commit them and provide an 
> extra patch only containing the functional changes for easier review 
> (perhaps together with mauve tests ;-)
> 
Will do -- it was dumb to bundle both in the first place.  What started
out as a mere docs check turned into functional alterations as well.
BTW, does anyone have a good suggestion of how to use Mauve when testing
serialisation?   I know the JAPI stuff has a tool for testing this, but
what is the preferred way from within Mauve?
> 
> Michael
-- 
Andrew :-)

Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

"Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history.
`Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn."
-- Richard Stallman

"We've all been part of the biggest beta test the world has ever known --
Windows"
-- Victor Wheatman, Gartner

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]