[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!
From: |
Hin-Tak Leung |
Subject: |
[cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish! |
Date: |
Fri, 2 Jun 2017 20:53:27 +0000 (UTC) |
Argh, I see your problem now - it is not really that glyphs are missing (which
they are in the output), but that dvips is simply producing rubbish!
Werner: we seems to have a serious problem :-). See the attached pdf. One is
from dvipdfmx, the other from dvips then ps2pdf . Same input as previous except
I just duplicated the whole thing and bold-face the 2nd copy to test for
bold-face.
Another side issue - I still can't get the pdfTeX workflow to work - switching
to individual OTF's, I now get:
===
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file SourceHanSerifTC-Bold.otf): OTF fonts must be
included entirely
===
Seems pdfTeX does not like CFF outlines. I'll see if google's is truetype.
sample-nose-3-dvipdfmx.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
sample-nose-3-dvips.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
- [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!,
Hin-Tak Leung <=
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/03
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/03
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/07
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, amigolang, 2017/06/08
- Re: [cjk] Argh I see, dvips seems to be producing rubbish!, Hin-Tak Leung, 2017/06/08