Re: [Chicken-users] url egg

[felix winkelmann]

On 2/21/07, Daishi Kato <address@hidden> wrote:
> On 2/21/07, felix winkelmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> > I think it's a bug:
> >
> > % diff url.scm~ url.scm
> > 222c222
> > <         (list userinfo host (or (string->number port) port))
> > ---
> > >         (list userinfo host (and port (or (string->number port) port)))
> > %
>
> What's (or (string->number port) port) for?
> Couldn't it be this?
>           (list userinfo host (and port (string->number port)))

Yes, right. Sorry, I tend to overlook the obvious.

> > Your url-compat defs look ok, but I haven't got the time for full testing.
> > If you think it's safe (and perhaps Kon can say a word or two about this),
> > just check your changes in.
>
> I'd like to confirm one thing.
> My idea is to put this code into the url egg,
> and let uri egg be removed or replaced to simply (use url).
> Is it OK for you guys?

Yes, that would be ok for me. That we have two eggs about url/uri
parsing is annyoing.

Kon?


cheers,
felix