[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: mailutils
From: |
Alain Magloire |
Subject: |
Re: mailutils |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2002 12:00:18 -0500 (EST) |
>
> On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 11:46:58AM +0200, Sergey Poznyakoff wrote:
>
> > > I do not want to scare anybody, but maybe(only maybe) we
> > > should take a seriously look at some basic C++ for mailutils2
> > > ... Ok I've said it ... I feel better.
>
> > If you mean providing a C++ interface in parallel with the existing
> > C, I quite agree with you. But rewriting the library in C++ will
> > mean that C programs will not be able to use it anymore.
>
> I haven't tried it, but shouldn't it be possible to write C++
> functions that use C linking conventions?
Yes. extern "C" { ... }
But that would be funny 8-) i.e. making the implementation
in C++ and providing a C level API for C programs 8-) totally
wicked, usually its the opposite.
- Re: mailutils, (continued)
- Re: mailutils, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils,
Alain Magloire <=
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Richard Dawe, 2002/03/15
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/16
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/20
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21