[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils]

From: Jeff Bailey
Subject: Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils]
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:29:00 -0800
User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:23:35AM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:

> I'd like to see tests, and would really like there to be a test
> framework. Having one makes it easier and faster to write code. The
> *unit test stuff (based on a 5 minute look at the cppunit docs :-))
> are fancy asserts. Maybe nice, but certainly not necessary.

I jhaven't looked at the cunit stuff.  junit and cppunit are nice
because they extend the object for adding a testing apparatice on to
them.  That way it's quite easy to test what's going into and coming
out of a specific object.

That make test-first programming a possibility.  I haven't gotten
there with my coding, but two of my friends have and I'm trying to
acquire the ability.

Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
 - hendridm

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]