[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils]
From: |
Jeff Bailey |
Subject: |
Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils] |
Date: |
Wed, 20 Mar 2002 20:29:00 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Sat, Mar 16, 2002 at 10:23:35AM -0500, Sam Roberts wrote:
> I'd like to see tests, and would really like there to be a test
> framework. Having one makes it easier and faster to write code. The
> *unit test stuff (based on a 5 minute look at the cppunit docs :-))
> are fancy asserts. Maybe nice, but certainly not necessary.
I jhaven't looked at the cunit stuff. junit and cppunit are nice
because they extend the object for adding a testing apparatice on to
them. That way it's quite easy to test what's going into and coming
out of a specific object.
That make test-first programming a possibility. I haven't gotten
there with my coding, but two of my friends have and I'm trying to
acquire the ability.
--
Some people play the lottery, some people use Ebay. Personally, I've
had much better luck with Ebay than the lottery
- hendridm
- Re: mailutils, (continued)
Re: mailutils, Sergey Poznyakoff, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13
- Re: mailutils, Alain Magloire, 2002/03/13
- cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Richard Dawe, 2002/03/15
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/16
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils],
Jeff Bailey <=
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Alain Magloire, 2002/03/21
- Message not available
- Re: cunit [Was: Re: mailutils], Sam Roberts, 2002/03/21
Message not availableRe: mailutils, Jeff Bailey, 2002/03/13