[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report
From: |
Brian Gough |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:17:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/23.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
At Sun, 2 Oct 2011 13:25:50 +0400,
Grigory I. Rubtsov wrote:
>
> Hi Alexey,
>
> You gave me an idea of further improvement. If one mupltiply the norm
> with every term, there will be no large numbers at all. Please
> consider the following patch for inclusion into GSL. It works with
> practically arbitrary large l.
>
Thanks for the patch. I tried it and it solves the problem you found.
I've committed the patch and extended it to include the error term, to
avoid the error being underestimated.
--
Brian Gough
- [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Grigory I. Rubtsov, 2011/10/01
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Alexey A Illarionov, 2011/10/02
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Grigory I. Rubtsov, 2011/10/01
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Alexey A. Illarionov, 2011/10/01
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Grigory I. Rubtsov, 2011/10/02
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Alexey A. Illarionov, 2011/10/02
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report,
Brian Gough <=
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Alexey A. Illarionov, 2011/10/12
- Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Brian Gough, 2011/10/12
Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report, Brian Gough, 2011/10/07