[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report

From: Brian Gough
Subject: Re: [Bug-gsl] gsl_sf_coupling_3j bug report
Date: Wed, 12 Oct 2011 14:37:11 +0100
User-agent: Wanderlust/2.15.6 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/23.3 Mule/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO)

At Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:15:08 -0400,
Alexey A. Illarionov wrote:
> I just want to emphasize that the Grigory's patch does not solve the
> problem it only extends a little bit range of possible j and m where
> algorithm gives reasonable answer. For example,
>     (200 200 200)
>     (-10 60 -50) = 2.55804e+18 +- 1.35857e+17
> while the correct answer would be approximately
>     7.4939e-4

Thanks, I understand.  Any patches for the large/asymptotic cases

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]