[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libposix build logs
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: libposix build logs |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:33:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi Gary,
> are you saying that (excepting the above) everything I reported should now
> be fixed? Or just the arches quoted above?
Just the listed architectures! That means, currently glibc/Linux and OSF/1 5.1.
I may also be working on Solaris and HP-UX. Someone else will have to AIX.
> As soon as I have time after the new year I will rerun the tests and let
> you know how I get on.
Running all tests and reporting the build logs is a fine thing to do once
every 3 to 12 months, so that we get a status. Other than that, it would
also be useful
(a) to actually investigate the failures and provide fixes for selected
platforms (this would be most welcome for AIX),
(b) to do these builds regularly (perhaps once per week) and submit
the logs to Simon's autobuild publishing daemon, so that they appear
at <http://autobuild.josefsson.org/gnulib/>. This would help
against the accumulation of small bugs that we have seen in the
past year.
Bruno
- Re: libposix build logs, (continued)
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/25
- Re: NFS timestamps, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: NFS timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/27
- Re: NFS timestamps, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/27
- Re: NFS timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/27
Re: libposix build logs, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/12/26
Re: libposix test version, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30