[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libposix build logs
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: libposix build logs |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 15:54:24 +0700 |
Hi Bruno,
On 25 Dec 2010, at 21:42, Bruno Haible <address@hidden> wrote:
> Regarding your reports on glibc/Linux systems:
>>> Distcheck results by architecture and compiler:
>>>
>>> ix86 RHEL 3 gcc 3.2.3 (317 tests passed)
>>> ix86 RHEL 4 gcc 3.4.6 (test-fcntl-h-c++.cc compile failed:
>>> 133: symbol `mknod' already defined)
>>> ix86 RHEL 5 gcc 4.1.2 (rename, renameat)
>>> ix86 SLED 10 gcc 4.1.2 (fchownat, rename, renameat)
>>> x86_64 RHEL 3 gcc 3.2.3 (fprintf-posix2.sh)
>>> x86_64 RHEL 4i gcc 3.4.6 (test-fcntl-h-c++.cc compile failed:
>>> 124: symbol `mknod' already defined
>>> 149: symbol `lstat' already defined
>>> 172: symbol `fstat' already defined)
>>> x86_64 RHEL 5 gcc 4.1.2 (dprintf-posix2.sh, fprintf-posix3.sh
>>> rename, renameat)
>>> x86_64 SLED 10 gcc 4.1.2 (rename, renameat)
>
> At this point, all the bugs are fixed, except
> - On the first machine type (x86 RHEL 3), I get the test failures
> related to NFS timestamps, mentioned in
> <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-11/msg00113.html>.
> - I could never reproduce the *printf-posix*.sh failures. They could be
> due to building libposix as a shared library.
That's great news, thanks for following up. As soon as I have time after the
new year I will rerun the tests and let you know how I get on. I've seen quite
a few patches go by in relation to my original reports; are you saying that
(excepting the above) everything I reported should now be fixed? Or just the
arches quoted above?
What is the status of the libposix branch now? Should I merge the tip of trunk
into the topic branch before making a new libposix tarball for test purposes?
Cheers,
Gary
--
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/25
- Re: libposix build logs, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/25
- Re: NFS timestamps, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: NFS timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/27
- Re: NFS timestamps, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/27
- Re: NFS timestamps, Paul Eggert, 2010/12/27
Re: libposix build logs,
Gary V. Vaughan <=
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] contents of topic/libposix for merge to master, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30
- Re: libposix installed files, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/30
- Re: libposix installed files, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30
Re: libposix test version, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30