[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NFS timestamps
From: |
Bruno Haible |
Subject: |
Re: NFS timestamps |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Dec 2010 11:46:04 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
Hi Paul,
> > - On the first machine type (x86 RHEL 3), I get the test failures
> > related to NFS timestamps, mentioned in
> > <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2010-11/msg00113.html>.
>
> I looked into that, and there are some obvious problems with the tests
> in m4/utimes.m4. I pushed the following, and it works for me, but my NFS
> server
> has only 0.02 seconds of clock skew right now and I don't have root
> access to introduce a more-serious skew. If you have the time, could
> you please try this patch out the host that you mentioned in your
> earlier email?
With your patch, I still get "checking whether the utimes function works... yes"
and the same failures:
test-futimens.h:108: assertion failed
FAIL: test-futimens
test-utimens.h:101: assertion failed
FAIL: test-utimens
The time skew on my machine is below 1 second:
$ date +"%Y-%m-%d %T.%N"; touch foo; ls -l --full-time foo; date +"%Y-%m-%d
%T.%N"
2010-12-26 10:44:40.642361000
-rw-rw-r-- 1 haible haible 0 2010-12-26 10:44:40.000000000 +0000
foo
2010-12-26 10:44:40.692375000
Bruno
Re: libposix build logs, Gary V. Vaughan, 2010/12/26
- Re: [PATCH 0/7] contents of topic/libposix for merge to master, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/26
- Re: libposix build logs, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30
- Re: libposix installed files, Bruno Haible, 2010/12/30
- Re: libposix installed files, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30
Re: libposix test version, Bruce Korb, 2010/12/30