[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-gnubg] FTGL

From: Jon Kinsey
Subject: Re: [Bug-gnubg] FTGL
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 08:20:26 +0100
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20041206 Thunderbird/1.0 Mnenhy/0.7

I've managed to get things to go wrong with mingw here (no numbers on
the cube and the point numbers are spaced incorrectly).  I'll take a
look at this over the weekend.

If you've got time try building the ftgldemo program, this should give
you an idea if ftgl is working at all.


Eli Dayan wrote:
> Hi All,
> I am trying to use 2.1.2 on Solaris 10 with Sun compilers.  FTGL itself 
> builds fine with no problems (aside from the fact that there seems to be 
> missing an 'uninstall' target in the makefile), however the code in gnubg 
> which is using FTGL does not build properly, and I must force gnubg to use 
> GLUT instead.  Why performance is still so poor on Solaris is a mystery to 
> me, however, if someone would like to assist me in getting the FTGL code 
> going on Solaris, I would certainly appreciate it.  I have already resolved a 
> few other probelms preventing a proper build on Solaris, and FTGL issues seem 
> to be the last hurdle.  According to this page: 
> http://opengl.geek.nz/weblog/archives/000092.html, it does not seem that FTGL 
> has much life left.
> Eli Dayan
> On Wed, 2005-09-14 at 04:58, Joseph Heled wrote:
>>I am using 2.1.2-1 on Kubuntu, Linux, and it does not work well.
>>On 9/14/05, Jon Kinsey <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>I've just tried building gnubg with the latest version of ftgl (2.1.2
>>>dec 2004) and the cube/other numbers display fine.
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-gnubg mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gnubg

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]