Yes, absolutely. I was just explaining how it worked. Not suggesting
this be done this way. The mian point was that
> >Here that score info could be stored in a
> >separate file and accessed according to need. That way it would be
> >faster, and would not imply touching pre-existing records.
>
> And this is the database design. Both don't really have that much to do
> with a backgammon programme.
Not really. The biggest issue that has been presented other than a worry
that users will constantly demand more, was that it would render large
existing records useless. The purpose of what I said was to deal with
this issue, not start building gigantic databases covering everything
from the pip counts to the shampoo brand of the users.