Re: the diff procedure

[Bob Proulx]

Karl Berry wrote:
> Yes.  Do you know if it is actively maintained these days?

It doesn't look like anything new since May 2007.

>     (BTW, I thought numdiff was GNU because I found it on a search under
>     'GNU Packages' on the gnu.org--I didn't look closely enough after
>     the hit.)
> 
> I can believe it, but I'm not seeing it.  If you come across it again,
> please let me know.

I think it might be easy to miss the "non" in the paths if you weren't
sensitized to it.

  http://www.nongnu.org/numdiff/
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/numdiff
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/download/numdiff

Of course that last rotates off to a mirror and the mirrors don't say
nongnu in the path after the redirect.  That seems confusing.

Bob