[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5408: date-to-time problem
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
bug#5408: date-to-time problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:41:49 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 16:26, Lennart Borgman
<lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can't you please just put in the remarks? In a case like this it is
> more effective I think.
Remarks? If it is causing confusion to users of the functions, it
should be documented.
Juanma
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18