[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5408: date-to-time problem
|
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
|
Subject: |
bug#5408: date-to-time problem |
|
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:19:46 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 16:11, Lennart Borgman
<lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> It would be much more fair if it told so. That would make the
> difference more obvious.
Doc patches welcome.
Juanma
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18