[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#5408: date-to-time problem
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
bug#5408: date-to-time problem |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:26:14 +0100 |
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 4:19 PM, Juanma Barranquero <lekktu@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 16:11, Lennart Borgman
> <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It would be much more fair if it told so. That would make the
>> difference more obvious.
>
> Doc patches welcome.
Can't you please just put in the remarks? In a case like this it is
more effective I think.
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Andreas Schwab, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/17
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem,
Lennart Borgman <=
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Chong Yidong, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Lennart Borgman, 2010/01/18
- bug#5408: date-to-time problem, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/18