[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents |
Date: |
Tue, 14 Apr 2015 16:00:46 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 |
> Regarding gawk, this does raise the question of whether node.c:r_force_number
> should force the numeric value to zero when strtod sets errno.
I think it should.
Andy, do you want to do that in the stable branch and see if anything
breaks in the test suite? If that's OK, please push, merge to master,
and push that as well. I've done enough beating on gawk for one day...
Thanks,
Arnold
- [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Sol Katzman, 2015/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents,
Aharon Robbins <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/17
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/17
- Re: [bug-gawk] NUMCUR and NUMBER flag usage, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/18