[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents
From: |
Aharon Robbins |
Subject: |
Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 10:40:21 +0300 |
User-agent: |
Heirloom mailx 12.5 6/20/10 |
Hi Mr. Katzman.
Thank you for taking the time to send in a bug report; I appreciate it.
The issue you report is exactly because you're at the limit of what
can be represented by double precision floating point numbers.
Ultimately, gawk relies on the C library strtod() function to convert
a string value to a number, and since an exponent of -308 is out of
range, strtod() fails to do. Thus, gawk treats 1e-308 as a string and
does a string comparison to 0.5. This fails.
When adding 0, the conversion from "1e-308" becomes 0. 0 + 0 is still
less than 0.5, so it "succeeds".
If perl handles this differently, that's great, but awk doesn't work
that way. :-) I believe that this is pretty clearly documented.
Also, 3.1.7 is quite old; 4.1.1 is current and I hope to release 4.1.2
Real Soon Now. The behavior you note hasn't changed in 4.1.x though.
Thanks,
Arnold
- [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Sol Katzman, 2015/04/09
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents,
Aharon Robbins <=
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/13
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/14
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Aharon Robbins, 2015/04/16
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/17
- Re: [bug-gawk] gawk erroneous comparison with large negative exponents, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/17
- Re: [bug-gawk] NUMCUR and NUMBER flag usage, Andrew J. Schorr, 2015/04/18