[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable
From: |
Mike Frysinger |
Subject: |
bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:06:03 -0500 |
On 17 Feb 2016 01:41, isabella parakiss wrote:
> On 2/17/16, Ruediger Meier <address@hidden> wrote:
> > As already said in practice it is already configurable by different kind
> > of distro-specific techniques or shell aliases. For example openSUSE
> > has envvar LS_OPTIONS. Maybe we could support such LS_OPTIONS variable
> > officially.
>
> Please no.
> It's painful to write a script that has to fight its environment to use
> tools with their default behaviour.
> Fighting against GREP_OPTIONS is already extremely annoying.
it's already done -- export QUOTING_STYLE to control default behavior
people should generally be avoiding ls in scripting anyways ...
there is `find` and shell globs to cover most cases.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, (continued)
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jon Stanley, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Assaf Gordon, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Paul Eggert, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, isabella parakiss, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable,
Mike Frysinger <=
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, isabella parakiss, 2016/02/17
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Eric Blake, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Eric Blake, 2016/02/16
bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Mike Hodson, 2016/02/17
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jim Meyering, 2016/02/17
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2016/02/18
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Eric Blake, 2016/02/18
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2016/02/18
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Paul Eggert, 2016/02/18