[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable
From: |
Pádraig Brady |
Subject: |
bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:06:09 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 |
On 16/02/16 12:41, Paul Eggert wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 10:48 AM, Ruediger Meier wrote:
>
>> What about readlink, basename, mktemp ... Why they don't have a
>> terminal mode too?
>
> If a command is commonly used at the top level, it probably should do
> something like 'ls' does, yes. The commands you mention aren't often
> used for that, though, so it's not high priority to change them.
Also commands like these don't have human interactive formatting
like ls, such as column alignment etc., and thus are more programmatic.
Consequently they can leverage the new %q printf format
that was also added in coreutils 8.25
$ realpath_shell() { realpath -z "$@" | xargs -r0 printf '%q\n'; }
$ touch 'z 1' 'z 2'
$ realpath_shell z*
'/home/padraig/git/coreutils/z 1'
'/home/padraig/git/coreutils/z 2'
cheers,
Pádraig.
- bug#22698: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jason A. Donenfeld, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Bernhard Voelker, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Jon Stanley, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Assaf Gordon, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Paul Eggert, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, isabella parakiss, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Mike Frysinger, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, isabella parakiss, 2016/02/17
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Eric Blake, 2016/02/16
- bug#22696: ls output changes considered unacceptable, Ruediger Meier, 2016/02/16