Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-coreutils (thread)

[Date Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Nov 30 2008 21:41:54 -0500 Threads in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• du --files-from feature request, Aaron Peterson, 2008/11/30
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Eric Blake, 2008/11/30
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/30
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/30
• [bug #24974] Document that comm's option "-1", "-2" and "-3" can be combined, anonymous, 2008/11/30
  • Re: [bug #24974] Document that comm's option "-1", "-2" and "-3" can be combined, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/30
• FYI: 5 small changes, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/30
• [PATCH] remove explicit declaration of putenv, ..., Jim Meyering, 2008/11/30
• cp --parents requires path as destination, can it be made to take filename?, Aaron Peterson, 2008/11/30
• (no subject), Martin Douglas, 2008/11/29
• dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Bob Proulx, 2008/11/29
  • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/30
    • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/30
      • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/30
• [PATCH] cp, mv: remove 3-year-deprecated+warned-about --reply option, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/29
  • Re: [PATCH] cp, mv: remove 3-year-deprecated+warned-about --reply option, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/29
• cp command option -x, --one-file-system, ebloch, 2008/11/28
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/28
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, James Youngman, 2008/11/29
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, ebloch, 2008/11/29
• Something strange with "date +%s" and timezones, Stan Marsh, 2008/11/27
  • Re: Something strange with "date +%s" and timezones, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/28
• [PATCH]: chmod, chown, chgrp: Reduce verbosity of silent mode, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/27
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod, chown, chgrp: Reduce verbosity of silent mode, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/29
• Re: Multi-threading in sort(or core-utils), Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/27
• credo, Bauke Jan Douma, 2008/11/26
  • Re: credo, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/28
• [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Paul D. Smith, 2008/11/26
  • [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Eric Blake, 2008/11/27
    • [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Paul D. Smith, 2008/11/30
  • [PATCH] pwd: add pwd -P, -L to TODO, James Youngman, 2008/11/27
    • Re: [PATCH] pwd: add pwd -P, -L to TODO, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/27
• [PATCH]: typo in last units factorization patch, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/26
  • Re: [PATCH]: typo in last units factorization patch, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/26
• Re: dd skip bug?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/26
  • Re: dd skip bug?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/26
• what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, landon kelsey, 2008/11/25
  • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Eric Blake, 2008/11/25
    • Message not available
      • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Eric Blake, 2008/11/26
      • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Jon Stanley, 2008/11/26
• bug report, Gordon, John (SAIC) (c), 2008/11/25
  • Re: bug report, Eric Blake, 2008/11/25
    • Message not available
      • sys/wait on Solaris (was: bug report), Eric Blake, 2008/11/25
• [bug #24935] incorrect information regardin size suffixes in -c option, anonymous, 2008/11/25
  • [bug #24935] incorrect information regardin size suffixes in -c option, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/26
• [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, anonymous, 2008/11/25
  • [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/26
    • Re: [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/26
    • [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/26
• Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Eric Blake, 2008/11/23
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Barry Kelly, 2008/11/23
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/24
    • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
      • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/25
      • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
      • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/25
      • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
• errore pid ......., aledom2, 2008/11/22
  • Re: errore pid ......., Bob Proulx, 2008/11/23
• Bug or Feature in mkdir(1), Gordon Hamachi, 2008/11/21
  • Re: Bug or Feature in mkdir(1), Eric Blake, 2008/11/22
• unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 2008/11/21
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Eric Blake, 2008/11/21
    • Re: unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 2008/11/23
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
    • Re: unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 2008/11/24
• [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
    • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Paul Eggert, 2008/11/21
    • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
      • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
    • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
      • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
      • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
      • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/22
• Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, David Corlette, 2008/11/20
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/20
    • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Karl Berry, 2008/11/20
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/20
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Reuben Thomas, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/22
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 2008/11/22
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/29
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/30
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/24
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/24
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/25
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/24
      • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/21
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Matthew Wakeling, 2008/11/20
    • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/20
• [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
  • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
    • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
    • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
• Re: Bug#505979: ls output format option, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
• [PATCH] tests: add a test of cp --preserve=links, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
• [PATCH] cp: remove unused code, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
• Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/19
  • Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
    • Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
• [PATCH] md5sum: Implemented --pedantic option to be more strict in verification mode, schoenfeld / in-medias-res, 2008/11/17
• new snapshot available: coreutils-7.0.59-4e38e6, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/16
• [PATCH] tests: change misc/printf-surprise so that it doesn't segfault anymore, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/16
• [PATCH] tests: remove debug code that would try to write into /t/k-env, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/16
• bug in expr, Dmitry Dobrushin, 2008/11/15
  • Re: bug in expr, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/15
  • Re: bug in expr, Eric Blake, 2008/11/15
• Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/11/17
    • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/17
      • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/11/17
      • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/17
      • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/11/17
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 2008/11/17
    • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, jidanni, 2008/11/17
    • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/17
      • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, jidanni, 2008/11/17
      • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/17
• limits determination in shell, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/13
  • Re: limits determination in shell, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/13
• tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/13
  • Re: tail --recursive, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/13
    • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/13
      • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/13
      • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/13
      • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/13
      • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/14
      • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
      • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/14
      • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
      • Re: tail --recursive, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/14
      • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/15
      • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 2008/11/15
• sobre RSS, IDEA PUBLICIDAD - webmaster, 2008/11/12
• coreutils-7.0 df test failures, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/12
• Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/12
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/20
    • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Eric Blake, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Andreas Schwab, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/21
• Bug eepc think virus, Majanne, 2008/11/11
  • Re: Bug eepc think virus, Micah Cowan, 2008/11/11
• glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/11
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 2008/11/11
    • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Paolo Bonzini, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/14
      • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/15
• configure syntax issue, Eric Blake, 2008/11/11
  • Re: configure syntax issue, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/11
• dircolors utility, Anna Barnes, 2008/11/11
  • Re: dircolors utility, Eric Blake, 2008/11/11
• chroot manpage not in section 8, Jan Engelhardt, 2008/11/11
  • Re: chroot manpage not in section 8, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/11
    • Re: chroot manpage not in section 8, Eric Blake, 2008/11/11
• [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 2008/11/10
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/11
    • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 2008/11/14
      • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/14
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/11
    • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 2008/11/14
      • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/15
      • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 2008/11/18
• Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image, Al Jorge, 2008/11/08
  • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image, Eric Blake, 2008/11/08
• Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/08
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, HggdH, 2008/11/08
    • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/09
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, James Youngman, 2008/11/08
    • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/09
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, James Youngman, 2008/11/09
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/09
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/10
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/10
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Eric Blake, 2008/11/09
    • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/09
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Eric Blake, 2008/11/09
      • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/09
• Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/08
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/08
    • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/08
    • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/11
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/12
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Phillip Susi, 2008/11/12
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/13
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/11/13
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 2008/11/14
      • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/15
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 2008/11/09
    • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 2008/11/09
• Why not enhance "sort" to handle floating point numbers?, Steve Wald, 2008/11/07
  • Re: Why not enhance "sort" to handle floating point numbers?, Philip Rowlands, 2008/11/08
• Re: Problem with ubuntu 8.04, Eric Blake, 2008/11/07
• misdirected ubuntu requests (yes this is relevant), Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/07
• Aide sur Ubuntu, Aboubacar KADRI, 2008/11/05
  • Re: Aide sur Ubuntu, Matthew Woehlke, 2008/11/05
• Aide sur LINUX, Aboubacar KADRI, 2008/11/05
• [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/04
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/04
    • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/04
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/07
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, James Youngman, 2008/11/08
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/10
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/10
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 2008/11/20
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Paul Eggert, 2008/11/21
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/21
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/22
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Bob Proulx, 2008/11/24
      • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, martin f krafft, 2008/11/25
• Re: [RFC] wc: add new option, --progress, Pádraig Brady, 2008/11/03
  • Re: [RFC] wc: add new option, --progress, Bo Borgerson, 2008/11/03
• [bug #24737] generated Makefile broken under Solaris, anonymous, 2008/11/03
  • [bug #24737] generated Makefile broken under Solaris, Eric Blake, 2008/11/03
• Re: dd - unsupported suffixes, Jim Meyering, 2008/11/01
  • Re: dd - unsupported suffixes, Henrik Holst, 2008/11/01

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc