Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

bug-coreutils (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Nov 30 2008 21:41:54 -0500 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• November 30, 2008
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Pádraig Brady, 21:41
  • [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Paul D. Smith, 21:04
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Brian Dessent, 20:44
  • Re: du --files-from feature request, Eric Blake, 20:40
  • du --files-from feature request, Aaron Peterson, 20:20
  • Re: [bug #24974] Document that comm's option "-1", "-2" and "-3" can be combined, Pádraig Brady, 19:26
  • [bug #24974] Document that comm's option "-1", "-2" and "-3" can be combined, anonymous, 17:12
  • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Jim Meyering, 16:05
  • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Pádraig Brady, 15:48
  • FYI: 5 small changes, Jim Meyering, 13:28
  • [PATCH] remove explicit declaration of putenv, ..., Jim Meyering, 13:15
  • Re: dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Jim Meyering, 12:50
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 12:46
  • cp --parents requires path as destination, can it be made to take filename?, Aaron Peterson, 09:13
• November 29, 2008
  • (no subject), Martin Douglas, 18:15
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, ebloch, 13:54
  • dd: reblock failure -- sporadic failures, Bob Proulx, 13:36
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, James Youngman, 10:59
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 10:53
  • Re: [PATCH] cp, mv: remove 3-year-deprecated+warned-about --reply option, Jim Meyering, 06:46
  • [PATCH] cp, mv: remove 3-year-deprecated+warned-about --reply option, Jim Meyering, 06:19
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod, chown, chgrp: Reduce verbosity of silent mode, Jim Meyering, 05:13
• November 28, 2008
  • Re: cp command option -x, --one-file-system, Jim Meyering, 09:15
  • Re: credo, Jim Meyering, 09:02
  • cp command option -x, --one-file-system, ebloch, 08:42
  • Re: Something strange with "date +%s" and timezones, Andreas Schwab, 04:02
• November 27, 2008
  • Something strange with "date +%s" and timezones, Stan Marsh, 23:10
  • [PATCH]: chmod, chown, chgrp: Reduce verbosity of silent mode, Ondřej Vašík, 09:28
  • Re: [PATCH] pwd: add pwd -P, -L to TODO, Jim Meyering, 06:24
  • [PATCH] pwd: add pwd -P, -L to TODO, James Youngman, 05:16
  • Re: Multi-threading in sort(or core-utils), Pádraig Brady, 05:09
  • [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Eric Blake, 00:16
• November 26, 2008
  • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Jon Stanley, 17:35
  • credo, Bauke Jan Douma, 17:14
  • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Eric Blake, 17:13
  • Re: dd skip bug?, Jim Meyering, 16:05
  • [bug #24949] coreutils pwd not implementing latest POSIX features, Paul D. Smith, 15:50
  • Re: [PATCH]: typo in last units factorization patch, Jim Meyering, 10:23
  • [PATCH]: typo in last units factorization patch, Ondřej Vašík, 10:06
  • [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Pádraig Brady, 09:34
  • Re: [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Jim Meyering, 09:05
  • Re: dd skip bug?, Pádraig Brady, 05:51
  • [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, Pádraig Brady, 04:49
  • [bug #24935] incorrect information regardin size suffixes in -c option, Pádraig Brady, 04:47
• November 25, 2008
  • Re: what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, Eric Blake, 23:43
  • what a pitiful explanation for sha1sum, landon kelsey, 23:41
  • sys/wait on Solaris (was: bug report), Eric Blake, 21:55
  • Re: bug report, Eric Blake, 21:25
  • bug report, Gordon, John (SAIC) (c), 20:23
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, martin f krafft, 20:23
  • [bug #24935] incorrect information regardin size suffixes in -c option, anonymous, 18:47
  • [bug #24934] confusing description of -c option, anonymous, 18:38
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 12:41
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Pádraig Brady, 12:09
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 11:56
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Pádraig Brady, 10:09
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 08:57
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 06:02
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 06:00
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 05:52
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:34
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 05:20
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:04
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 04:46
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 04:32
• November 24, 2008
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Matthew Woehlke, 11:17
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 11:06
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 11:05
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Jim Meyering, 03:25
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 00:21
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Bob Proulx, 00:12
• November 23, 2008
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 21:37
  • Re: errore pid ......., Bob Proulx, 19:35
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Barry Kelly, 18:55
  • Re: "du -b --files0-from=-" running out of memory, Eric Blake, 09:14
• November 22, 2008
  • errore pid ......., aledom2, 14:47
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 12:32
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 10:18
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 08:58
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 08:30
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 07:17
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 06:10
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 04:36
  • Re: Bug or Feature in mkdir(1), Eric Blake, 00:20
• November 21, 2008
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 20:03
  • Bug or Feature in mkdir(1), Gordon Hamachi, 19:43
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 19:40
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 18:54
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 18:00
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 17:41
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Matthew Woehlke, 15:58
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Paul Eggert, 14:01
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Paul Eggert, 13:25
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Pádraig Brady, 09:16
  • Re: unix command od got a bug, Eric Blake, 09:14
  • unix command od got a bug, Chunyin Kung 龔俊穎, 09:11
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 08:19
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 08:16
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Andreas Schwab, 08:15
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 07:52
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Reuben Thomas, 07:47
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Jim Meyering, 07:38
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 06:33
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 06:26
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 05:34
  • Re: [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Jim Meyering, 03:16
• November 20, 2008
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Brian Dessent, 20:02
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Karl Berry, 18:46
  • [PATCH] Don't do unneccesary memory copies in dd., Pádraig Brady, 18:12
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Matthew Wakeling, 15:21
  • Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, David Corlette, 15:21
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Pádraig Brady, 11:24
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 11:09
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 11:04
  • Re: Possible bug with grep/sed/tail?, Paolo Bonzini, 11:01
  • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 09:41
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 09:10
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 08:58
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Andreas Schwab, 08:50
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 08:19
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 08:15
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Eric Blake, 08:14
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 07:51
  • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 07:42
  • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Jim Meyering, 07:41
  • Re: [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 07:22
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 07:19
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Ondřej Vašík, 06:29
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 06:14
  • [PATCH] Add getlimits utility for use in tests, Pádraig Brady, 06:07
  • Re: Bug#505979: ls output format option, Jim Meyering, 04:51
  • Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 04:36
  • Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 04:23
  • [PATCH] tests: add a test of cp --preserve=links, Jim Meyering, 04:14
  • [PATCH] cp: remove unused code, Jim Meyering, 04:12
• November 19, 2008
  • Re: Bug#412688: cp -la takes big amounts of memory, Jim Meyering, 16:29
• November 18, 2008
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 13:30
• November 17, 2008
  • [PATCH] md5sum: Implemented --pedantic option to be more strict in verification mode, schoenfeld / in-medias-res, 21:20
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 08:00
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 08:00
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 08:00
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Patrick Schoenfeld, 08:00
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 05:25
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 05:00
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, jidanni, 04:45
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 04:35
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 04:34
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, jidanni, 04:33
• November 16, 2008
  • new snapshot available: coreutils-7.0.59-4e38e6, Jim Meyering, 08:25
  • [PATCH] tests: change misc/printf-surprise so that it doesn't segfault anymore, Jim Meyering, 06:13
  • [PATCH] tests: remove debug code that would try to write into /t/k-env, Jim Meyering, 06:11
• November 15, 2008
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 17:57
  • Re: bug in expr, Eric Blake, 14:49
  • Re: bug in expr, Jim Meyering, 14:42
  • bug in expr, Dmitry Dobrushin, 14:39
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Jim Meyering, 12:12
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 09:57
  • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 05:10
  • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 04:34
• November 14, 2008
  • Re: Bug#353911: md5sum --check checks only if _all_ are bad, Jim Meyering, 15:09
  • Re: tail --recursive, Matthew Woehlke, 15:05
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 13:50
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Paolo Bonzini, 13:30
  • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 09:16
  • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 08:58
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 08:36
  • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 07:15
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Pádraig Brady, 07:12
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 06:55
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 06:41
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 06:06
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 05:45
  • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 03:54
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 03:00
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 00:45
• November 13, 2008
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 18:40
  • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 17:12
  • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 16:56
  • Re: tail --recursive, Jim Meyering, 16:23
  • Re: limits determination in shell, Jim Meyering, 16:17
  • Re: tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 15:53
  • Re: tail --recursive, Matthew Woehlke, 12:16
  • limits determination in shell, Pádraig Brady, 08:54
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Ralf Wildenhues, 07:52
  • tail --recursive, Simon Windows, 07:47
• November 12, 2008
  • sobre RSS, IDEA PUBLICIDAD - webmaster, 12:48
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Phillip Susi, 11:22
  • coreutils-7.0 df test failures, Jim Meyering, 06:51
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 05:22
  • Re: [PATCH]: chmod - do inform about using different mode than requested with SGID/SUID/sticky bits without permissions to change them, Jim Meyering, 04:41
• November 11, 2008
  • Re: Bug eepc think virus, Micah Cowan, 22:28
  • Re: glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Bruno Haible, 18:39
  • Re: configure syntax issue, Jim Meyering, 15:24
  • Bug eepc think virus, Majanne, 15:04
  • glibc's snprintf bug causes printf(1) failure with MALLOC_PERTURB_ != 0, Jim Meyering, 13:35
  • configure syntax issue, Eric Blake, 12:55
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 09:59
  • Re: chroot manpage not in section 8, Eric Blake, 08:34
  • Re: chroot manpage not in section 8, Jim Meyering, 08:25
  • Re: dircolors utility, Eric Blake, 07:54
  • dircolors utility, Anna Barnes, 07:41
  • chroot manpage not in section 8, Jan Engelhardt, 05:57
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Jim Meyering, 05:25
  • Re: [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Pádraig Brady, 04:55
• November 10, 2008
  • [PATCH] cp/mv: xattr support, Kamil Dudka, 13:37
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 11:58
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 11:18
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 06:21
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Ondřej Vašík, 04:21
• November 09, 2008
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 18:53
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Dr. David Alan Gilbert, 18:06
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 16:56
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Eric Blake, 16:04
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 12:59
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 11:09
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Eric Blake, 09:08
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 07:59
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, James Youngman, 07:21
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 02:57
• November 08, 2008
  • Re: Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image, Eric Blake, 22:46
  • Ubuntu 8.10 CD Image, Al Jorge, 22:43
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, James Youngman, 16:54
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, HggdH, 15:13
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, James Youngman, 14:42
  • Re: [Bug 294348] Re: ubuntu directing users to coreutils mailing list for general problems, Jim Meyering, 13:51
  • Re: Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Jim Meyering, 13:05
  • Threaded versions of cp, mv, ls for high latency / parallel filesystems?, Andrew McGill, 12:04
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, James Youngman, 10:22
  • Re: Why not enhance "sort" to handle floating point numbers?, Philip Rowlands, 06:40
• November 07, 2008
  • Why not enhance "sort" to handle floating point numbers?, Steve Wald, 21:04
  • Re: Problem with ubuntu 8.04, Eric Blake, 15:13
  • misdirected ubuntu requests (yes this is relevant), Matthew Woehlke, 14:25
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Jim Meyering, 04:22
• November 05, 2008
  • Re: Aide sur Ubuntu, Matthew Woehlke, 15:24
  • Aide sur Ubuntu, Aboubacar KADRI, 15:09
  • Aide sur LINUX, Aboubacar KADRI, 15:09
• November 04, 2008
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 09:14
  • Re: [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Pádraig Brady, 08:20
  • [PATCH]: ls: add --user-format option for user defined format, Ondřej Vašík, 07:56
• November 03, 2008
  • Re: [RFC] wc: add new option, --progress, Bo Borgerson, 12:22
  • Re: [RFC] wc: add new option, --progress, Pádraig Brady, 09:21
  • [bug #24737] generated Makefile broken under Solaris, Eric Blake, 08:35
  • [bug #24737] generated Makefile broken under Solaris, anonymous, 08:32
• November 01, 2008
  • Re: dd - unsupported suffixes, Henrik Holst, 09:51
  • Re: dd - unsupported suffixes, Jim Meyering, 03:41

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc