[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sort --version-sort
From: |
Bruce Korb |
Subject: |
Re: sort --version-sort |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Aug 2008 06:07:42 -0700 |
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>
> Unfortunately, I pushed without first combining my
> adjustment patch, so we're stuck with the separate change
> and crummy Subject.
>
Don't tell anybody and a week or two down the line nobody will remember :)
- Re: sort --version-sort, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --sort=version, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/14
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/14
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/15
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/15
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort,
Bruce Korb <=
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/20
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19