[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: sort --version-sort
From: |
Jim Meyering |
Subject: |
Re: sort --version-sort |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:12:56 +0200 |
Simon Josefsson <address@hidden> wrote:
> Bruce Korb <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Here is the usage text from my latest --sort=version patch (attached),
>> now that paperwork is in order.
>
> What is the status of this work? I have wanted to use sort this way
> several times but became disappointed that there is no support for it
> every time.
The most recent patch I saw was incomplete.
Some of these were missing:
documentation (--help, NEWS, .texi), a proper "log", tests.
- Re: sort --version-sort, Simon Josefsson, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --sort=version, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --version-sort,
Jim Meyering <=
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/13
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/14
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/14
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/15
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/15
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Bruce Korb, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Jim Meyering, 2008/08/19
- Re: sort --version-sort, Eric Blake, 2008/08/19