[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for e
From: |
Jay Belanger |
Subject: |
[Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs. |
Date: |
Thu, 24 May 2007 23:32:43 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Martin Rubey <address@hidden> writes:
...
> And the initialization code is a mess. For example, why are there
> two functions hooked to comint-output-filter-functions, namely:
>
> axiom-output-filter (str)
> make-output (str)
They were probably added at different times; I don't think there's any
reason why they can't be combined into one function.
> Why is (sit-for 0 axiom-after-output-wait) necessary?
That's an artifact from maxima.el, where waiting for the output was
causing problems. There were some cases when the output was being
yanked into a different buffer but the output was truncated, and this
was a tweak to wait a bit longer for output if necessary
(`axiom-after-output-wait' was customizable and could be increased).
> Is (setq comint-prompt-regexp axiom-prompt) still useful? I am now marking
> prompts as 'field,
In that case, `(setq comint-prompt-regexp axiom-prompt)' shouldn't be
necessary.
>> > * For me, the following is *very* severe. Try:
>> >
>> > for i in 1..10 repeat ([j for j in 1..2000]; output "hi")
>> >
>> > in a usual shell buffer and in axiom mode. Very unfortunately, the axiom
>> > mode currently accumulates all output and then displays it at once.
>> > Since I
>> > use such constructs often to be able to check how far a computation got
>> > already, it makes the mode unusable for me.
>>
>> This has nothing to do with waiting for output, or even Emacs. Axiom
>> will do that when called with the -noclef option; I have no idea why.
>
> Well, at least in wh-sandbox, this is *not* the case.
I'm surprised.
When I changed the value of `axiom-args' from "-noclef" to "", axiom
mode no longer accumulated all output and displayed it at once, and
when I started Axiom in an xterm with "axiom -noclef", it then did
accumulate all output and displayed it at once. I don't have
wh-sandbox, though.
> And if I remove all these accept-process-output stuff, it works,
> too.
What works? Axiom mode will display the output incrementally, rather
than all at once?
> However, I have then some problems deciding when to decide that a
> prompt arrived, since it seems that emacs continues execution of my
> elisp code, even if output is still arriving.
What code is being run while Axiom output it arriving?
Jay
- [Axiom-developer] axiom.el for xemacs, (continued)
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-mail] [ANN] new version of axiom mode for emacs., Francois Maltey, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-mail] [ANN] new version of axiom mode for emacs., Alasdair McAndrew, 2007/05/24
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: [Axiom-mail] [ANN] new version of axiom mode for emacs., Waldek Hebisch, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., Martin Rubey, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., C Y, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., Jay Belanger, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., Martin Rubey, 2007/05/24
- [Axiom-developer] Re: [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs.,
Jay Belanger <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Axiom-developer] [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., Martin Rubey, 2007/05/26
- Re: [Axiom-developer] [ANN] yet a better version of the axiom mode for emacs., Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/05/26