[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Bug?
From: |
Ralf Hemmecke |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Bug? |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:24:12 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0b2 (X11/20070116) |
But Integer has Ring so if you add 3 new functions to Complex2, 1, =
and characteristic() then both Integer and Complex2 can satisfy Ring.
I feared that the anonymous category or the "0: %" were the problem.
But now it is good to know that I should currently avoid the use of
anonymous categories if I want my code to run in Axiom.
Apparently the interpreter does not understand how to evaluate Aldor
anonymous categories.
I guess once Aldor becomes open source
According to
http://www.aldor.org/pipermail/aldor-l/2007-March/000620.html
we should have some news at the end of this week.
we could classify this as a bug. :-)
So if SPAD cannot handle anonymous categories and is seems it cannot
http://wiki.axiom-developer.org/SandboxNoAnonymousCategoryMacro
then this is a bug even without free Aldor.
Ralf
- [Axiom-developer] Bug?, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/03/29
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Bug?, Bill Page, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Bug?, Bill Page, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Bug?,
Ralf Hemmecke <=
- [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Bill Page, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Bill Page, 2007/03/29
- Re: [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Ondrej Certik, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/03/30
- Re: [Axiom-developer] domains with parameters versus Python classes, Bill Page, 2007/03/30