[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb
From: |
Gabriel Dos Reis |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb |
Date: |
04 May 2006 10:42:22 +0200 |
root <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
| 2) sed and awk are NOT standard parts of a windows distribution.
| again as a matter of policy we need to reduce the requirements
| so we can work across a larger number of systems. ideally all
| of axiom would run in common lisp and porting becomes a copy
| operation. C is only slightly more problematic. in fact, the
| key reason that axiom does not currently run on the mac is breakage
| caused by C. awk/sed/autoconf all seriously complicate the port issue.
What are the complications posed by autoconf?
It is a developer tool, not end-user tool. It has been used
successfully for a wide range of applications on a wide range of
platforms -- where the applications "should just work".
| frankly i'd much rather see the tools devolve into lisp implementations.
| gcl, sbcl and clisp generate native exe files on windows and executables
| on linux. given that lisp is a full programming language and is integral
| to axiom why don't we write code that is trivial to port rather than
| add requirements that are certain to make axiom unportable?
You want to increase the number of contributors and yet insist on
doing everything in Lisp? I don't think that is going to scale
long-term-wise.
-- Gaby
- [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, (continued)
- RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, root, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb,
Gabriel Dos Reis <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, C Y, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb / Lisp Skills, Martin Rubey, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb / Lisp Skills, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb / Lisp Skills, Martin Rubey, 2006/05/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb / Lisp Skills, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/03
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04
RE: [Axiom-developer] Re: noweb, Page, Bill, 2006/05/04