[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Aldor and Axiom

From: Jay Belanger
Subject: Re: [Axiom-developer] RE: Aldor and Axiom
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:12:08 -0600
User-agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

"Bill Page" <address@hidden> writes:
>> Hmm.  But aren't there some cases where you want this, like
>> (say) knowing that 4 is a real integer without having to
>> explicitly say that? (Sorry that's probably a dumb question).
> The phrase "real integer" is kind of dumb ... :) What other kinds
> of integers are there?

Complex (Gaussian) integers?

> I still firmly believe that Aldor is the best way forward. Given
> that everyone who has posted to the:
> petition (including Steven Watt!) has been positive about the
> idea of making Aldor open source, I think we should just proceed
> based on that idea.

Is it that clear that it will become open source?
It may be that it just takes a while, but is it possible that it's
taking a while because there are roadblocks that we aren't aware of? 


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]